In our post-Christmas episode of The Basement Vagrants Podcast we discuss two of the biggest trailers hitting the internet lately, The Three Stooges and The Dark Knight Rises.
Download the episode here
A podcast about video games, movies and the internet.
Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark is quite possibly the most aptly named movie to come to theaters in recent memory. Not only was it very easy to not be afraid, but it was very very dark.
Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark (which will henceforth be known as D’BAD) is about a young girl named Sally who comes from L.A. to live with her father in the Adam’s Family’s house and soon find out there are tiny little monsters living inside the basement who want to kill her and eat her teeth. It stars Guy Pierce, Katie Holmes and Bailee Madison, and while none of the performances were bad, none of them really stood out either. Twelve-year-old Bailee Madison is pretty good as Sally, performing well above what is commonly expected from a child actor. The acting is competent, but does nothing to add to the quality of the picture.
D’BAD is a movie that takes absolutely no risks. The plot is fairly simple and straight forward, there is no twist ending or big reveal and all of the events play out exactly as you would expect them to. It’s safe to say that if you’ve seen more than a handful of horror movies in your lifetime, you’ve seen this movie before. Every scene feels like it was borrowed from some other below average horror flick, there is nothing unique or interesting at all on screen here and by the end it makes you feel tired and bored, at least it did to me.
As far as visuals go, if there is anything to see on screen worth noting the movie is so dark I could not see it. The creature designs look alright, and it’s really nice to see monsters return to the big screen in theaters dominated mainly by ghosts and aliens, and I thought they looked fairly unique but there are only a couple moments where you can get a decent look at them. For the most part, this is intentional to build suspense and fear but even in the scenes where you’re supposed to be able to see them it’s difficult due to the films extremely dark tone. The house itself looks good, which is a good thing since the entire movie takes place there, and the scenes in the creepy basement are for the most part… well, creepy. The movie never dares to do anything different visually, instead it settles into a cozy little corner of cinematic cliché where there is no fear of taking a chance and failing.
Do yourself a favor and watch this instead
There are also a lot of times when the characters in the movie behave like complete idiots, or seemingly important points are completely glossed over. In one scene, Sally is attacked by hundreds of the monsters in the library of her mansion during a party, and manages to actually kill one of the creatures just before her father and his guests burst in the room. Her dad rushes in to comfort her and then the scene ends. Sally doesn’t think to show the dead monster to her dad to finally prove that they’re real? Even if her dad did believe her at that point, wouldn’t it be an important plot point for him to actually see one of the creatures that has been terrorizing his daughter? I guess not, because despite deliberately showing her kill one of the things it is never shown or mentioned again. Another thing that bugged me is that the creatures are afraid of light (real original) but everyone in the movie, including the girl, insists on keeping the lights off at all hours of the day, and only doing anything at night. I understand that if they kept the place lit up like Vegas 24/7 then the monsters wouldn’t get any screen time, but do they have to practically invite them to ruin their lives. Even when the entire family finally realizes that the house is swarming with demons that want to eat their daughter and kill her stepmom, they decide to stay in the house just one more night, then leave in the morning. Yeah, that makes sense. Also, I’m not going to spoil the ending, but it makes absolutely no sense either. Characters are attacked for no reason, the monsters purpose is explained but their actions make no sense in regard to their overall goal, plot points are glossed over or forgotten about completely, it’s really just a mess. The whole film suffers from the classic horror movie syndrome where the characters act completely illogically so that the evil force can prevail, despite its incompetence.
Bottom line, D’BAD isn’t completely offensive to the senses. It isn’t the worst thing I’ve seen in theaters, not even close, but it’s just not that interesting, scary or original in any way. I’m hard pressed to find any redeeming value in it other than the fact that it wasn’t horribly painful to see. It’s a movie that has no reason to exist, and is destined to lie forgotten in the $5 bin at Wal-Mart in a years time.
This is about as 3D as the movie gets
In Shark Night, a group of teenage horror movie clichés decide to spend summer break at the island home of one of their friends. But, unbeknownst to everyone, the lake that surrounds this island is infested with sharks. That’s about all you get a for a plot, other than a needless, tacked on twist ending which isn’t even worth spoiling because really, they could have left it on the cutting room floor and it wouldn’t have made a bit of difference. Actually, scratch that, it would have made it better. Coming from the director of Snakes on a Plane, the plot seems fitting. Sharks in a Lake would have made a great sequel, but one thing this movie does not do is play up the simplicity for laughs. In fact, the film seems to be taking the whole killer shark island thing rather seriously. Even scenes that could easily be played completely for laughs are taken with a rather serious tone. An example being when the character Malik (played by who fucking cares) has his arm bitten off and his girlfriend killed by the sharks, grabs a harpoon and goes back into the lake to take revenge. At first I wasn’t quite sure whether they were making a joke or doing it with a straight face, I’m still not exactly sure, but since it’s the only goofy, lighthearted moment in the whole film, I have to believe that that isn’t what they were going for. The original planned title of the movie was going to be Untitled 3D Shark Thriller, but apparently someone higher up than director David Ellis made him change the name to Shark Night 3D. Maybe that’s what the movie was originally going for, but all of that has been cut from the finished product.
As far as characters go, there isn’t any. Donal Logue has a couple funny moments as the laid-back, small town sheriff, and there’s a couple laughs between the hillbilly boaters that attempt to rescue the stranded 90210 rejects from the island, but every member of the gang of soon-to-be-chum are completely bland and uninteresting. This tends to be a standard for movie characters in the killer animal/slasher genre, since they are basically set up as meat puppets to be killed off in gruesome ways, but the gore and horror elements of this flop are not good enough to endure their generic stock dialogue and cut and paste character traits.
Also, for a movie about killer sharks, you’d think there would be some pretty gory stuff going on, but you’d be wrong. Most of the gore takes place underwater or after the camera cuts away. This is likely due to the fact that this is a PG-13 movie, a big mistake for a movie that’s trying to do violence and gore and actually be serious about it. This also means that there is very little foul language and absolutely no nudity, two important staples of the genre. The cgi sharks all look lifeless and bland and despite the fact that there are supposed to be multiple breeds of shark on display, it looks like the animators only bothered to render 3 different models and change the size to suit the situation. There are some decent looking aerial shots of boats speeding along swampy waterways and some of the camera views from underwater look alright, but it’s even a stretch to say that these are that good. I think I’m just desperate to find something good here.
Not as bad as this, but close.
For a movie with 3D in its title, and especially one using it as a complete gimmick, you would assume that the 3D is going to be done well right? Wrong again. There are two types of 3D typically in movies these days: post-production “layer” 3D where the movie is digitally altered after being filmed to give the impression of 3D layers, and “real” 3D where special cameras are used to film in 3D from the very beginning. Shark Night 3D is the former. This can be noticed when things are coming at the camera, which happens pretty infrequently. In a proper 3D movie, if a shark is swimming towards you, it will appear to come out of the screen and close to your face, in the movie the shark faces bulge out a little bit, but there is nothing even close to a shocking 3D shark attack to be seen. There is one or two times when things appear to come out of the screen and actually make you react, and they’re both near the end of the movie, and only elicit a slight shutter. This is not good enough! When you have a lame, boring, cliché and uninteresting movie, 3D can actually make it good if it’s done right. My Bloody Valentine 3D is a great example of this. Bad plot, bad characters, warmed over 80s slasher schlock; great 3d, great movie. This movie is a cake without the icing, a vegetable without the dip, a massage without a happy ending.
I wasn’t going into this movie expecting anything deep or interesting, but what I was expecting was to have some fun, like the fun you have watching a Friday the 13th or Nightmare on Elm Street, or if you want to scrape the bottom of the barrel, maybe even a Saw movie, but there is absolutely nothing to grab onto in this film that’s even remotely entertaining. Shark Night 3D is the biggest disappointment I’ve had at a movie theater in a very long time. I went into this movie expecting one thing, and got the old bait (pun intended) and switch. Maybe it’s my fault for not reading reviews, maybe it’s my fault for not paying more attention to the internet and its endless stream of spoiler-laden info, but I guess that’s what I get for wanting to see a movie and be surprised and have fun.
Goldfinger is widely considered to be the best that the James Bond series has to offer. It’s certainly the most iconic Bond film and it set the standard that all subsequent entries in the series would attempt to reach. Homage has been paid to this films many memorable scenes and characters in Hollywood, in movies, television, comic books, music and many other mediums. It was the first Bond film to receive an Academy Award (sound editing) and one of the most financially successful Bond films of all time.
The Plot
The movie opens with James Bond 007 relaxing at a luxurious hotel in Miami, where he just happens to run across the wealthy, gold obsessed, Auric Goldfinger. Bond and his partner Felix Leiter soon receive word from M, the leader of MI6 British Intelligence that they are to monitor Goldfinger and try to gain some information about his means of international gold smuggling. Bond conducts surveillance on Goldfinger eventually learning of his plan to rob the United States Gold Repository of Fort Knox.
Out of all the movies so far, and perhaps all in general, Goldfinger has the most exciting, creative and unique plot, settings and characters. Some of the greatest scenes take place in a beach resort in Miami, an exciting midnight car chase in a munitions factory, Goldfingers Kentucky ranch and Fort Knox, including some fantastic scenes in an airplane, the shootout in the gold vault and the entire Operation Grand Slam master scheme to rob the biggest bank in the world. This is the point in the series where the action and espionage aspects are starting to hit their full stride and really set the gold standard for the genre.
The Villain
Goldfinger is one of the most recognizable Bond villains of all time, and it’s no secret as to why. He’s smart and witty, cocky and yet modest at the same time, and most of all for a villain, he’s actually very likable. Goldfinger isn’t a madman bent on destroying the world, or ruling it, or killing people in any way. Goldfinger loves gold, and his sole plan in the movie is to acquire gold and make it more valuable. Like Bond quips in one of their meetings “You’re nothing but a common bank robber”. In fact, if Goldfingers plan to break into Fort Knox had gone off without a hitch; nobody would have died at all. The United States economy would have tanked, sure, but there would have been no bloodshed. Goldfinger has a simple, endearing charm and even though he straps 007 to a table and attempts to separate his left half from his right, in a way you want him to succeed with his plan, because after all, who doesn’t love a good heist.
It’s hard to pinpoint exactly why Goldfinger is such a good villain, all I can say is that everything about him works. He’s just as funny, sinister and clever enough to be a criminal mastermind without turning into a caricature. He’s just innately entertaining to watch.
The Girl
Honor Blackman plays Pussy Galore, an ace pilot and flight instructor, and personal employee of Goldfinger. She is quite possibly the strongest female character in the Bond series, and to this day remains one of the only women able to resist 007’s manly charms, well, for the most part. In the end she plays a key role in the foiling of Operation Grand Slam and even more so than Tatiana Romanova in From Russia With Love assures James Bond’s victory over his nemesis. Throughout the movie there isn’t even much of a romance built up between Bond and Pussy, she’s strictly business and in the end her good heart triumphs over her allegiance to evil. She is one of the best Bond girls in the franchise and is also one of the most memorable.
My Thoughts
Goldfinger is quite simply one of my favorite Bond films. If I were to rank all of them it would definitely be in the top 3. I gladly watched Dr. No and From Russia With Love for these reviews, but I was actually looking forward to watching Goldfinger again for what would probably be the tenth time. There are some interesting faults with the plot that I want to mention though, they don’t take away from the quality of the movie, but they always stick out in my mind. Goldfinger uses the help of about 20 or so businessmen in order to get the resources he needs for his heist and in the middle of the film he invites them all to his ranch and gives a long elaborate presentation on his plan and how it could benefit them. He explains that they can all take the money he owes them and leave or stay and increase the amount ten times. One man decides to cash out and leave, and Goldfinger sends him on his way in an expensive car. When the man is leaving, Goldfinger then locks the room and pumps in poison gas, killing all of his investors, then drives the other man in the car to an impound lot, has him shot and has the car crushed. What’s the point? What’s the point in explaining his whole plan to a room full of men he’s just going to kill anyway, and what’s the point of ruining his Rolls Royce killing the one man who disagreed with the group he’s just going to kill anyway?
What’s worse is how Goldfinger treats Bond. Bond sleeps with Goldfinger’s woman and causes him to lose a large amount of money during the beginning of the movie, so he sends Oddjob (former wrestler Harold Sakata) to kill the girl, but doesn’t kill Bond. Then, later when Bond and Goldfinger are playing golf, Bond cheats in order to make Goldfinger lose even more money in the wager they made, again Goldfinger lets him go. Then, after Bond follows him to the factory, he is captures and about to be killed by Goldfiner, finally. So, Bond very easily tricks Goldfinger into letting him live, but keeping him imprisoned. Of course, Bond escapes and learns more about the heist, then is captured again. Does Goldfinger kill him now? Now that he knows every detail of his plan? Nope. He brings him with him to Fort Knox to be handcuffed to the bomb (which literally has an on/off switch inside of it that James pretty easily gets to). Goldfinger may be one of the best villains in a Bond movie, but he is nothing if not a bit bumbling.
The Plot
SPECTRE is at it again, this time planning to steal a cryptographic device called a Lektor from the Russians and sell it back to them, and exact revenge on James Bond for killing their operative Dr. No. SPECTRE’s leader, referred to only as Number 1, enlists the services of ex-counter intelligence officer Rosa Klebb (Lotte Lenya) to trick Tatiana Romanova (Daniela Bianchi) a cipher clerk working in Istanbul, Turkey, into defecting to British Intelligence with the device, and luring James Bond into their web.
The Villains
The main villains in the film are Rosa Klebb and a SPECTRE assassin named Donald Grant, but unfortunately neither of them is used to great effect, from an action standpoint. Grant attempts to kill Bond on a train by pretending to be his British contact, which leads to a pretty exciting fight, but it is one of very few in the movie, and despite being referred to as one of the organizations top assassins, he never really seems very threatening or dangerous. Grant only gets one attempt at Bond before he is killed and while the scene is well done, it doesn’t really make Grant out to be a great killer. Klebb is the most interesting villain in the movie. She is a cold, stern, rock faced Russian woman who brings a sense of menace and steely soviet power into her scenes. She’s definitely more serious and threatening than Dr. No, but she really only has one actual confrontation with Bond near the end. She is basically the “brains of the operation” and it’s understandable that she wouldn’t really get her hands dirty in this matter, but her scenes mostly consist of dialogue between her and her boss. The biggest villain however is the barely seen Number 1, the leader of SPECTRE. This is the character that is most recognizable as the archetypal Bond villain. He is only seen from the chest down, stroking a white cat. Most people would instantly recognize him as the character that the Dr. Evil character from the Austin Powers movies is based on. From Russia With Love is the first time this staple of the Bond series is seen in the films, and does a great job foreshadowing his larger role in the films to come.
The Girl
Tatiana Romanova is a cryptograph clerk who is used as a pawn to deliver the Lektor and to ensnare Bond and bring him to SPECTRE. She goes along with the fake defection plan, under threat of death, but upon meeting Bond and spending time with him, she falls in love, betrays Klebb and SPECTRE and ultimately helps Bond defeat his enemies. This is the classic Bond girl. She’s not just a bystander who gets mixed up in Bond’s adventure by chance, she’s not an empty headed bimbo, she’s a smart, competent, and loyal companion to Bond and she sets the gold standard of what a Bond girl should be. Unlike Honey Ryder from Dr. No who stumbles into Bond’s mission near its completion and flounders alongside him until it’s finished, Tatiana is there from the beginning, and is essentially the biggest part of SPECTREs plan, and it’s only because of her that Bond was able to survive in the end (spoiler alert).
My Thoughts
From Russia With Love is considered by many to be the best James Bond film ever made, and I can see why. It has the smooth pacing of Dr. No, but with more action, stunts, and excitement, but not so much that it seems like a dumb action film. The characters are interesting and memorable and Sean Connery gives an amazing performance yet again. This movie had a much larger budget than the first in the series, and it’s very apparent from start to finish. There are more explosions, the scenery is more exotic and the boat chase at the end is one of the best in the series. At 115 minutes, the movie is the perfect length, and there seems to be more music than in the previous film. The opening credits also begin to resemble more modern Bond openings, with dancing women, psychedelic colors and interesting camera tricks. Matt Monro’s theme song is heard in instrumental only at the beginning, and is played again during the ending with full lyrics, using traditional Russian instruments to give that real soviet feeling.
Unlike the previous film, Dr. No, From Russia With Love’s plot is easy to follow, simple and flows nicely from the start of the movie until the end. The characters motivations are clear, their goals are realistic and logical and everybody acts the way they’re supposed to. This might sound like a cold and formulaic analysis of a story, but it’s a refreshing change from the murky, unclear motivations and actions of the previous film. At this point the James Bond series was off to a strong start, and it would only get stronger with the next in the series, Goldfinger.